The Lindbergh’s Flight Preview: Yale Cabaret Flies Into the Wild Blue Yonder

312IDR9mGGL._SL500_SS500_brecht-lindbergh

Lindbergh’s Flight

By Bertolt Brecht. Presented by Kate Attwell, Gabe Levey, Brenda Meaney and Mitchell Winter.

Through March 16 at the Yale Cabaret, 217 Park St., New Haven. Remaining performances are Friday and Saturday at 8 & 11 p.m. $15, $10 students. (203) 432-1566. http://yalecabaret.org

 

In its time, Lindbergh’s Flight marked a turning point in the theater writings of Bertolt Brecht. It was in some ways the start of the “didactic” style which colored his works for decades afterwards. It was a contemporary “learning play, or Lehrstück, based on a major news event of the time in which it was written: Charles Lindbergh’s 1927 flight across the Atlantic Ocean. The script was presented on radio in 1929, then revised in concert form as a cantata for orchestra, chorus and solo vocalists. It got good reviews and further productions, and Brecht himself thought enough of it to continue revising and rethinking the piece decades after its premiere.

The essential plot concerns the flyer of an airplane describing his preparations for flying acorss the Atlantic Ocean, while some rivals mention their attempt to make the trip first and thwart the flier of his glory. The play’s themes, which extend to the very medium in which it was first broadcast, involve technological innovation and international one-upmanship.

The Yale Cabaret is refueling Lindbergh’s Flight this weekend, in a fresh reinterpretation by Kate Attwell, Gabe Levey, Brenda Meaney and Mitchell Winter. It opened last night and runs through Saturday March 16. (I’ll be seeing the show late tonight, and posting a review here tomorrow.)

Levey, Meaney and Winter are students in the acting program at the Yale School of Drama. Attwell is in the school’s dramaturgy program but has distinguished herself at the Cabaret as a director, most recently with her triumphant production of Athol Fugard’s The Island. For this production, they’re eschewing titles like “director” and pushing for an ensemble, collaborative outlook.

The team all worked on one of the YSD’s in-class “Drama 50” shows together, and “wanted to work together again in the style we’d created.”

Did that style happen to be didactic mid-20th century German radio opera? Not at all, but when the students went looking for interesting scripts to apply their newfound communal experimental skills to, “somehow the idea of Brecht came up,” Attwell says. I interviewed her and Levey earlier this month at Book Trader about the project. “We started looking at the lesser-known ones, and stumbled across Lindbergh.

“Brecht went through this period of writing short plays about people who are performing the plays while learning about their subjects.” This so-called “learning play for children,” the first in a subset of Brecht’s work dubbed “didactic plays,” was a good fit for their own social/political/theatrical explorations.

With some scripts, when you hear they’ve been reworked from top to bottom, you worry. With Brecht, who wrote about very topical subjects happening in a very specific place in a very specific style at a very specific time of history for a very specific audience, some measure of reinterpretation is always required. “It’s safe to say,” says Gabe Levey, “that we’ve been irreverently reverent.” They were encouraged in their rewrites by the fact that Brecht himself reworked his script a number of times to keep up with changing views about its purported hero and the culture’s sense of how the world could be brought closer together—or dominated—by the power of radio waves and transcontinental transportation. “The number of rewrites that this poor little play went through…,” Levey sympathizes, regarding Brecht’s original manuscript. “And yet there’s only one published text,” of 19 pages in length.

Another key element which changed over time was how Lindbergh is portrayed in Lindbergh’s Flight. At first, Brecht made him a stand-alone character. Then, as world events exposed the aviator’s Nazi-sympathizer side, Brecht revised the play so that the title character’s voice and image  were diluted and no longer represented by a single actor. (The title of the play was also changed from Der Lindberghflug to Der Ozeanflug.) “We have been grappling with the narrative of Lindbergh,” Attwell says. “The history of the play is that it goes from one Lindbergh to eight Lindberghs to no Lindbergh at all.” In this rendition, the character is played by “one person, sometimes, most of the time.”

Another wrinkle, adds Levey: “We’re not opera singers. We don’t even know if we could get the rights to perform the Weill music.” During Brecht’s work on it, the play’s musical score by Paul Hindemith (whose outstanding career as a composer and music theorist included decades of influential teachings at Yale) was augmented with tunes by Brecht’s frequent collaborator Kurt Weill. None of this music figures in the Yale Cabaret production.

Oh, and… “[Lindbergh’s Flight] is not even meant to be performed.” Live onstage, that is. It’s a opera written for radio. “The text is lyrics, not dialogue. There are problems we’ve had to solve dramatically.” Adds Levey, with Brechtian portentousness: “All of our devising and aesthetics, all our history, are coming to bear on this.” Some of the solutions come through sound design, dance movement and original music. Cast-wise, the show’s cast and chorus has been modified to a four-person ensemble. “We thought about video, but left that behind.” The show isn’t overtly technical, Levey explains: “All the technical elements you can see in what’s actually being done onstage. It’s like ‘Welcome to our room.’”

Ultimately, though, the show seeks to honor Brecht’s intention, not ironicize or overrun them. As Gabe Levey puts it, choosing his words carefully, “When Lindbergh’s Flight is performed within our show, it is Lindbergh’s Flight.”

That carefully parsed explanation is followed by this: “But Lindbergh’s Flight does not a full theater performance make.” The show as written clocks in at well under half an hour, and even Brecht paired it with another piece to make for a fuller evening. In this case, the length and the nature of the piece invite the addition of other presentational elements which can acclimate it to modern times and performance methods.

Some of the alterations in tone and concept come from the very act of trying to stage the piece at the Cabaret. “There’s inherent humor in it,” Levey says, because of the operatic lyrics, transformed, with fairly with fairly didactic content. There’s that idealism. Brecht writes this in the 1920s. Ninety years later, the ideas are pretty complicated now. We wanted to figure out how to make this work now. How can we be fun and open and communicating with the audience?” They found some understanding just in the attempt. Levey and Attwell quote one of their collaborators and castmates on the project, Brenda Meaney, as saying, “Being in a room with strangers, being totally vulnerable, is a way of being that is totally a political statement.” To which Levey adds, “We’re tickling the idea of actors acting.” The process of creating the show—a fairly lengthy process for a Cabaret project, due to its collaborative nature—was kept upbeat and exploratory. When approaching designers, Attwell and Levey say, they weren’t looking for technicians but for “playmates” whose imagination could help further the collective vision.

Levey has never done a Brecht show before, as an actor or otherwise. Levey was involved in a production of Caucasian Chalk Circle when she was younger. Brecht does get intensively studied at the Yale School of Drama, however, so the Lindbergh’s Flight team feels they’re on firm footing (or walking in the clouds, if you’d rather).

Astute Cabaret-goers can relate the themes of disorienting air travel and finding one’s place in the universe found in Lindbergh’s Flight to original works by Attwell and Levey which played at the Cabaret space in the 2011-12 season. hundredyearspacetrip, a collaborative piece created by the We Buy Gold theater troupe which Attwell co-founded with Nina Segal, was a meditation on life paths not taken, wrapped up in a parable of space exploration. Levey’s solo show Brainsongs, or the play about the dinosaur farm, was, in part, about slowing the world down so it can be appreciated and managed. Both shows blended high comedy with abstractions. Both examined technology, with overt placement of microphones or lip-synching interludes.

The team’s special relationship as classmates and scholars and artists promises a thought-provoking reworking of a rarely-seen yet undeniably important Brecht one-act.

“We’re really excited to put it out there,” Gabe Levey exults. “And meet this weirdo text head-on.”

 

 

Categories: Uncategorized, Yale Cabaret, Yale School of Drama | 23 Comments

The Small Things Review

Screen shot 2013-02-23 at 12.31.53 PM

The Small Things

Through March 9 at the Yale Cabaret, 217 Park St., New Haven. (203) 432-1566, www.yalecabaret.org

Directed by Hugh Farrell and Emily Reilly. Costume Designer: Nikki Delhomme. Sound Designers: Palmer Hefferan and Tyler Kieffer. Dramaturg: Hugh Farrell. Percussionist: Victor Caccese. Stage Manager: Rob Chikar. Producer: Eric Gershman. Performed by Christopher Geary (Man) and Emily Reilly (Woman).

 

A small red curtain opens on a small proscenium-style set on a small stage stuck in the corner of the basement Cabaret space. There’s a big window on a small wall, bare-lightbulb footlights and two actors face-painted and dour as if they’d just escaped from the trashcans of Endgame. They sit in chairs and face front, never rising as they recite a story about a village culture which urges silence and respect on its citizenry by having people’s tongues removed.

It’s a numbing, nail-biting tale, which I kept losing the thread of. I was more fascinated by The Small Things’ abstractions: that compact playing area splashed by gray paint, the intense yet sedate playing style, the forced Irish accents and cackles. Deliberately off-putting yet friendly and inviting in its own meticulous way, The Small Things makes for a calm, creepy bout of late-night theater. I was lulled by its stark white-face pronouncements and steady rhythms. The matter-of-fact delivery masks a dire story of oppression and social submission.

Seemingly aware of its own power to sedate, the play provides its own wake-up calls and points of reflection with the abrupt chiming of alarm clocks. The whole production is controlled and runs like clockwork, one of the frozen grins behind the oration belonging to co-director Emily Reilly.

Enda Walsh has more topical works on his resume, such as the Internet-conscous Chatroom. Traditional-wise done the obligatory Christmas Carol adaptation, and also adapted Dostoevsky’s Brother Karamazov, the myth of Penelope & Odysseus and (easily his best-known work in the U.S.) the Broadway adaptation of the romantic film Once. The Small Things exists in a special small place in Walsh’s canon of over two dozen plays. It exists in a special small place in this current Cabaret season as well. There happens to have been a lot of wall-breaking confessionals in the Cabaret of late, plays which directly acknowledge and interact with the audience. With the one-two punch of last week’s surrealist-inspired The Bird Bath and now this Beckettian dual-monologue, I realize how much I’ve missed remote, expressionistic or abstract presentations in the space. The Small Things removed my tongue for just an hour, and I’m better for it.

Categories: Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Kevin Tighe: In a Starving Class by Himself

Curse of Starving 151hi

Kevin Tighe in Gordon Edelstein’s production of Sam Shepard’s The Curse of the Starving Class, at Long Wharf Theatre through March 20. Photo by T. Charles Erickson.

 

When the Long Wharf approached me (as they usually do) to see if I was interested in interviewing any members of the cast of their upcoming show, the show was Sam Shepard’s The Curse of the Starving Class so my immediate response was “What about the sheep?” I was duly put in touch with Bill Burloni, who trained the lamb for this production. But I sat on the piece for too long, somebody else did a story on the sheep, and I lost interest in it as a preview piece. (I may get that one together and run it before Curse of the Starving Class closes March 10.)

Then I saw the show, and realized that I just HAD to talk to Kevin Tighe. I’d interviewed him last when he starred opposite Jane Alexander at the Long Wharf in Eugene O’Neill’s Mourning Becomes Electra a decade ago.

From interviewing him back then, I recalled Tighe as an intelligent actor who really did his homework for a role. While he was in Mourning Becomes Electra, he was spending his daytimes at Yale’s Beinecke Library poring through its O’Neill archives. This trip, he’s studying the library’s priceless collection of correspondence between Thornton Wilder and Gertrude Stein. Tighe’s also been working out daily at the Yale gym.

Tighe told me he apparently wasn’t Long Wharf’s first choice to portray Curse  of the Starving Class’ drunken, delusion patriarch Weston, and that the short notice with which he had to take the gig affected his ability to prep for it in his usual way. Yet he completely nails this difficult role. His ability to focus intently, not just on his self-aggrandizing and addled utterances but on how he confines himself to small spaces within this production’s sprawling set, is mesmerizing. He also finds ways to make this violent character vulnerable.

So how does he do it? “Part of it,” Tighe told me in a ‘phone interview Tuesday, “is a knowledge of the area [Shepard] was writing about. It isn’t too far from where I grew up. The place, the area, the people, I knew real well. I spent a lot of time in the Mohave desert and Bakersfield.” Curse of the Starving Class is set in “the kitchen of a family farm, rural California” and references desert areas nearby.

“The writing is very poetic,” Tighe continues. “It directs you to go beneath. There are inner rhymes, repetitions. You’re almost taken, if you submit yourself to the role. It’s beyond realism—there’s a familiarity of almost real time situations, taken into poetry. You find yourself purposefully divorcing yourself from any reality in order to raise the level of the art.

    Kevin Tighe (on table) with Ben Becher in Curse of the Starving Class at Long Wharf Theatre. Photo by T. Charles Erickson.

Kevin Tighe (on table) with Ben Becher in Curse of the Starving Class at Long Wharf Theatre. Photo by T. Charles Erickson.

“I did have trouble with that final scene, when [Weston] turns his life around.” It’s an abrupt change, from comatose alcoholism to a sudden overnight semblance of sanity and sobriety, at a time when the play as a whole becomes more and more chaotic and unpredictable. “But I realized that this was the only place he has to go. He’s in profound denial. Denial of death, and denial of the essence of life.

“On the inside or on the outside, this is his life. It doesn’t matter. He’s constantly psychically on the run. I feel like he’s a World War II victim of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.

“I hadn’t read this play before, but when I did I went ‘I know this guy. I know this place.’ Part of it was from my own relationship to my father. He was very distant to me. This struck a chord. Being around people like him, growing up during that time, I got pretty invested in this role.”

Tighe has done Sam Shepard before, but not in a while. He was in Buried Child at Arena Stage in 1983. “I remember a monologue I had there, which the director decided to do as a Jimi Hendrix thing, like a loud guitar solo. With most audiences, there was no reaction. But these high school kids attended a matinee, and they went crazy.”

He’s found Long Wharf audiences to be very accommodating with Curse of the Starving Class’ many shocking moments and abstractions. “When I first read the script, looking at the urination scene [performed by Weston’s son Wesley in the play, pissing on the 4H project created by Weston’s daughter Emma], I thought ‘Do you really want to do this?’ But the houses have been very welcoming. It’s the art of pyrotechnics and energy. Everyone in the cast is devoted to doing the play, and the audience welcomes that. There’s also this outbreak of humor in it. Even the eating scene at the end has humor in it.”

Curse of the Starving is a fine workout for an actor of Tighe’s strength and abilities. It’s intriguing to wonder if audiences recognize him from the many films and TV shows he’s been in. Some of that work is easier to find than ever: his ‘70s adventure show Emergency, in which he co-starred with Randolph Mantooth, Julie London and Bobby Troup, is on Netflix, as is the series Freaks & Geeks, on which Tighe plays Jason Segal’s father. The musical Newsies, in which Tighe played the evil warden of a boy’s home, has been turned into a hit Broadway musical. The actor also appeared in a slew of John Sayles movies, including Matwan and Eight Men Out.

These days, Tighe is acting less and writing more. He did early productions of the play Bengal Tiger at the Baghdad Zoo, but wasn’t with the show when it went to New York. “I made a choice of living in the Northwest, between Seattle and Vancouver. I was still able to get offers on occasion. The fabric of that has changed. It’s now TV pilot season, and I do get lots of opportunities to tape for pilots, but I’m just not that interested in that sort of thing anymore. I’m more interested in doing poetry.

“I’m writing plays, keeping myself poetically busy.”

Kevin Tighe’s also keeping himself poetically busy on a Long Wharf stage for a few more performances now, and New Haven’s lucky to have him.

Categories: Uncategorized | 453 Comments

The Bird Bath Review

leonora+carrington+in+her+studio

The Bird Bath

Through March 2 at the Yale Cabaret, 217 Park St., New Haven. (203) 432-1566, www.yalecabaret.org

Created and performed by Chasten Harmon, Hannah Leigh Sorenson and Ariana Venturi. Directed by Monique Barbee. Dramaturg: Sheria Irving. Scenic Designer: Mariana Sanchez Hernandez. Lighting Designer: Masha Tsimring. Sound Design and Original Music: Palmer. Stage Manager: Alyssa K. Howard. Producer: Emika Abe. Production Assistant: Janyia Antrum.

 

Mental illness has been a recurring theme at the Yale Cabaret, not just this month or this season but throughout the venue’s existence. It’s a popular topic in theater in general, its appeal perhaps deriving from the multiple identities and reinterpreted realities actors cope with on a constant basis.

To its immense credit, the Yale Cabaret has seldom if ever fallen into stereotypes of the form. The Cabaret an intimate space, and clichés of loud ranting madness simply aren’t right. You can suggest more with long bouts of silence or a flicker of an eyelid.

The Bird Bath is an exceptional meditation on madness, human yet also wonderfully theatrical.

Director Monique Barbee, who as an actress at Yale has done all manners of anxiety—from still to jittery to Bergmanesque—leads a brazen and engaging cast through a variety of remote yet engaging, largely wordless vignettes inspired by the autobiography of surrealist artist Leonora Carrington. The performance has nothing to do with the long career and many literary and artistic accomplishments of Carrington (who published several other books and died in 2011). It hones in on a period in 1940 when she was in an asylum in Spain , hallucinating and moodswinging in response to a drug regimen of Cardiazol.

Carrington is played by three women at once, who serve more as a triptych of living paintings than as a dramatic narrative. Their movements often contradict each other, but they are conform at times, with precise choreography and the beautiful, painterly touch of having the women dress themselves in similar brightly colored gowns.

The natural language for insanity onstage is Antonin Artaud’s Theatre of Cruelty methods, most famously unleashed in Peter Brook’s 1960s stage and film versions of Peter Weiss’ Marat/Sade. The characters in that piece don’t relate to each other much, and are left to their own devices. The Bird Bath tries something trickier—a layered, multiple-perspective view of mental disorder, exquisitely choreographed and paced, with a modicum of narrative assistance. There are voiceovers drawn from Carrington’s book Down Below, about her ordeal in Spain, but the play doesn’t use the book to impose a plot or structure. This is not a descent into madness but a portrait of being in the midst.

The Bird Bath has as many “danger” elements in its presentation as does Sam Shepard’s Curse of the Starving Class at the Long Wharf across town. There’s nudity, a water-filled tub, broken eggs, (nearly) induced vomiting, entrances through outdoor windows and mouthfuls of citrus fruit. Yet The Bird Bath doesn’t go wild. Nor does it overplay its Surrealism card and lay on odd juxtapositions for no good reason. It’s an ordered, refined yet irrepressible burst of conflicted and barely contained emotions.

The show’s as harrowing to see as it must have been for Leonora Carrington (who survived the Cardiazol ordeal gracefully and lived to be 94) to live, and must be  frightfully intense to perform, especially when each actress must be so aware of the others around her. The periods of calm are as eerie as the frantic leaps and struts.

I don’t think I’ve ever been more relieved to an actor smile peacefully and thankfully at a curtain call.

Categories: Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The All This Noise review

276736_425141630899473_207854993_n

All This Noise

Through Feb. 23 at the Yale Cabaret, 217 Park St., New Haven. (203) 432-1566, www.yalecabaret.org

Created by Jackson Moran, with Ethan Heard, Kate Ivins and Martha Jane Kaufman.  Additional text by Christopher Moran. Additional script development with Alyssa K. Howard, Jack Tamburri and Masha Tsimring. Director: Ethan Heard. Dramaturg: Martha Jane Kaufman. Scenic Designer: Souri Yazdanjou. Costume Designer: Seth Bodie. Lighting Designer: Masha Tsimring. Sound Designer: Matt Otto. Projection Designer: Nicholas Hussong. Stage Manager: Alyssa K. Howard. Producer: Kate Ivins. Cast: Jackson Moran (as himself, Christopher, Mary Tom, Tim, Bob, Caroline and Nancy)

 

Confession is good for the soul, and Jackson Moran confesses throughout this autobiographical one-man show about his brother Christopher’s lifelong issues with mental illness. In the show’s first moments, as the affable Moran easily ingratiates himself to the audience, he admits that he is an alcoholic and visits a Yale counselor regularly. This admission works in many ways: it’s a humanizing moment. It’s a worthwhile Public Service Announcement. And, dramatically, it neatly inserts an underlying theme of this play: that it’s often necessary to seek help.

All This Noise is full of confessions but, thankfully, not of guilt. Moran steps up nobly numerous times in this chronicle of his brother’s struggles, but also accepts—without hammering the point—that it’s OK to share his concerns, ask for help, accept the advice of those outside the family. He portrays himself, but also his brother, their mother, and several counselors and mental health specialists.

This approach stops the show from being a lecture or a confessional or a public prayer. For it is a show, after all. Director Ethan Heard and a cadre of designers make sure it is. There are projections, and a chalkboard, and some interactive passing-around of photos in the audience. As Christopher’s tale is told, props emerge from nondescript cardboard boxes on the floor. Most of them are items used in suicide attempts. The text is largely Jackson Moran’s first-person take on the events concerning Christopher, but is augmented with poetry and other writings by Christopher himself, as well as useful quotes from Shakespeare and Springsteen.

Jackson Moran keeps the narrative on-course without either overplaying or underplaying it. It’s clearly a wrenching and draining exercise for him, but his restraint and clarity gives it high purpose.

For a piece of such personalized emotion—from  deep love to honest exasperation—All This Noise also succeeds in universalizing its message of concern for the mentally troubled and the need for all of us to fight the stigmatization of the illness and find new ways to fund and apply research into this expensive and under-insured field. The play calls out New Jersey Governor Chris Christie for hypocrisy and references 9/11 and Newtown. It’s possible to perceive some of these topical references as over-the-top, too much or “too soon,” but as a work of drama, All This Noise’s noise reaches that level of high dudgeon.

Help people! Help people more!

Categories: Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Betting Big on Bisno: A CNBC Broadway-based special airs tonight

305518Bartiromo_Mariagrace1

New Haveners know Debbie Bisno who produced various cabaret-style shows in New Haven for years at such diverse venues as the Lawn Club and Chow restaurant. Down the road in New York City, Bisno’s known as a Broadway producer. She’s featured prominently on a new TV special airing tonight (Feb. 4, 2013) at 9 p.m. on CNBC.

Betting Big on Broadway is hosted by Maria Bartiromo, the business news broadcaster whom Joey Ramone immortalized in song back in 2001. According to a press release, it purportedly “pulls back the curtain on Broadway revealing high risk, big drama, and mountains of money.”

I was able to screen the show in advance, and the language is pretty sensational there too, promising a glimpse of “Broadway’s biggest capitalists” in a realm where “eight out of ten shows are financial failures.

Bisno, best-known hereabouts for bring the Moth storytelling series to town, at venues as varied as the Q Club and the Long Wharf Theatre, stands out from the rest of the pack in this investor-filled program. She’s the scrappy little producer raising money for a play. She’s also described as having produced a number of shows in league with others, but not having really brought a show along from start to finish herself until this one.

The rest of the producers shown are in the major leagues: Disney, the Jujamycyn company, and a lucky guy who helped bring The Phantom of the Opera to these shores and has made something like $6 million on it so far.

For theater geeks, there isn’t any good gossip in Betting Big on Broadway. The producers of the Spider-Man musical mention that “If it’s to tour, it will tour in arenas,” and it’s mentioned it would need to make 1.5 million a week for three years to break even. But that’s not new info.

Bisno is presented thus:

“Debbie Bisno has a show to sell.” She “has her own money and career on the line.” In her own words, “I’m dialing for dollars.” Bisno’s shown selling shares (for as low as $10,000) in a new production that’s taking about $2.5 to $2.7 million to produce.

The show in question is the “dark comedy” Grace by Craig Wright, the most recent play in Wright’s Pine City cycle.

It has big stars in the cast (Paul Rudd, Ed Asner, Michael Shannon, Kate Arrington), a rotating set, and its run is affected by Hurricane Sandy.

Compared to the other shows CNBC covers in Betting Big on Broadway, Bisno’s is fresh and contemporary. Her production of Grace closed just last month, making it through its entire scheduled 16-week run.

Bartiromo turns Bisno’s journey into a mystery, revealed at the program’s end:

“Later on, find out if Debbie’s Grace will turn a profit.”

The special covers first preview of Grace, its opening night and its mixed reviews.

Bisno says, “Nice ticket sales, but nothing to say, oh, we’re fine.”

Betting Big on Broadway is very business-minded, all about profits with nothing about aesthetics and almost nothing about marketing strategies.

Most of the statistics presented involve the investment it takes to keep a show running, or how long it may take for a show to break even. A lot is made of the flexible pricing structure at theaters owned by the Jujamycyn company.

Our own community’s Debbie Bisno comes off very well. Hers is the most present-tense of the various stories being told, and the most human. And I don’t want to be a spoiler, but things could’ve turned out a lot worse for her.

Categories: Uncategorized | 1 Comment

The Cloud Nine Review

images

Cloud Nine

Through Jan. 26 at the Iseman Theater, 1146 Chapel St., New Haven. (203) 432-1234.

Caryl Churchill’s Cloud Nine was inescapable in the 1980s. I have vivid memories of the first time I saw the show—Tommy Tune’s U.S.-premiere Off Broadway production in 1980. I also have vivid memories of the second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh and umpteenth times I’ve seen the show. Throughout the ‘80s and well into the ‘90s, every college drama troupe and hip community theater company in the country claimed this play. And why not? Few scripts offer such a range of emotions, such opportunities for actors to stretch, and such acute social commentary.

Then there was a long period when Cloud Nine was surpassed by other empowering sociopolitical satires, some of them by Caryl Churchill herself. Seeing it again this week at the Yale School of Drama, in an immaculately designed and hyperphysically staged production directed by Margot Bordelon, I was taken aback.

The script holds up pretty well, but it can never be what it once was, which was all kinds of topical.

My impression of Cloud Nine in the 1980s and ‘90s was that the first act—a chaotic over-the-top romp set in Colonial Africa at the end of the 19th century—was arch and old-world and corny and like one of the old British Music Hall-style “Carry On” films, only with homosexual references and other stylistic anachronisms. The second act—set at the time the play was written, and imbued with the brilliant conceit that though it is 80 years later than Act One, the same characters (now played by other actors) have aged only 20 years or so—seemed much more contemporary not just in playing style but in its attitudes and philosophies. There was a stark difference between the acts.

No longer. They’re both nostalgic. Act Two is now a memory of Margaret Thatcher’s England, which is worlds away from current political realities and social norms.

But so much else is different too.

In the 1980s, nobody was scoring Cloud Nine with music by The Sex Pistols, The Clash, Psychedelic Furs and Generation X, as this production does, even those tunes are contemporary with the time the play was written. They were still too raw, too apart from the other performing arts. (This production also lays on a lot of Bowie, from his androgynous early ‘70s Ziggy Stardust/Hunky Dory period. That music is still the easiest possible shorthand for magnifying gay themes.)

The cast here plays up the Britishness in both halves of the play, with arch accents and stereotypes that might have been gleaned from BBC sitcoms. This is not wrongheaded—Churchill’s comic instincts are bold and grand and shocking, and deserve to be played with heft. But there are—or at least were—subtleties in the second half of the play that have disappeared.

They may be too young to appreciate an age when portraying same-sex couplings would raise gasps even from accepting audiences, and they may be building characters around history books rather than daily headlines, but there are some vivid and captivating performances here. I was most struck by Hannah Leigh Sorenson, who on a couple of occasions at the Wednesday performance I saw had to improvise to cover up an unforeseen moment (a dropped piece of a doll in the first act, a curtain which refused to drop in the second). While keeping up the cartoonish quality required of all the performers, her natural strokes added a humanity. Chris Bannow, who is white, gave a nuanced and credible performance of the black African servant Joshua, while a number of actors performed believably as young children. All the cross-gender casting is convincing and sincere.

Cloud Nine was an eye-opening experience for many people in the 1980s. Not so much now, but its experimentalism and sharp comments about social and sexual relationship still provokes debate and useful insights. This production honors the play’s legacy by staging it professionally and treating it like the monument it is. There’s a beautifully triptych of tableaux vivants as the show begins, and a rousing, neatly choreographed climax at the end.

Categories: Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Island Review

day_cabaret_poster_10_8.5x11_2_0

The Island

Through Jan. 26 at the Yale cabaret, 217 Park St., New Haven. (203) 432-1566, www.yalecabaret.org

By Athol Fugard, John Kani and Winston Ntshona. Directed by Kate Attwell. assistant Director: Gabriel DeLeon. Scenic Designer: Kristen Robinson. Costume Designer: Seth Bodie. Lighting Designer: Oliver Wason. Sound Designer: Matt Otto. Stage Manager: Louisa Balch. Producer: Lico Whitfield. Performed by Paul Pryce (John), Winston Duke (Winston) and singers from the Yale a cappella chorus Shades: Carol Crouch, Edwina Kisanga, Dianne Lake, Ian Miller, Naima Sakande.

 

New Haven has a special relationship with the works of South African playwright Athol Fugard dating back to his first American successes. The Long Wharf did a couple of his one-acts (including The Island) in 1974, then the Yale Rep premiered Master Harold… And the Boys and Place for Pigs in the ’80s. In recent years, the Long Wharf coaxed Fugard out of semi-retirement and did three successive world or East Coast premieres of his plays, which remain as strident, socially conscious and politically astute as they ever were.

This wondrous production of The Island, which Fugard created in conjunction with its original cast members ( a collaboration illegal under the apartheid laws in place when it was written) understands that this script begins conversationally, then builds into clear poltical discourse and well-articulated beliefs, then must be grandly and unapologetically theatrical as those ideas are classically enforced in a provocative play-within-a-play.

As with another classic freewheeling 1970s two-hander recently produced at the Yale Cabaret, Sam Shepard’s Cowboy Mouth, The Island is a fuller and richer and deeper production than audiences have any right to expect. It takes full advantage of the small Cabaret space, leaping from a confined unvarnished platform in the center of the room—representing the cell where two political dissidents are being held—to the men’s full-bodied, audience-circling interpretation of Sophocles’ Antigone.

This The Island has two strong, in-the-moment, physically and intellectually challenging performances. That’s why the play usually gets staged: if you find two worthy actors you can do it anywhere. But this production, directed by Kate Attwell, adds confident theatrical trappings to that essential naturalism. There’s a live five-person a cappella choral group singing between scenes. There are long silent periods where the characters dress themselves and make up their faces for their Antigone performance. There are clever lighting cues (designed by Oliver Wason) which shift the audience’s attention subtly without being obtrusive. There are long offstage passages of unintelligible gruntings and moanings in the prison yard.

The blend is masterful. The designs support the players rather than undercutting them. Surrounding the small wooden platform of a mainstage with the audience (who sit mostly at two long room-length tables) lends focus and also adds a useful stifling effect. Paul Pryce (as John, in prison for his ties to outlawed political organizations) and Winston Duke, as—uh, Winston, a role named for the man who originally played it, Winston Ntshona; the character is in jail for publicly burning an identity document) rail and rant and confess and cry and laugh and joke in just the right scale for the room, at just the right volume.

This whole Island thing just fits—fits the space, fits the actors, fits a time when radical ideas of freedom are again held suspect, fits a month when Nelson Mandela is back in the news, the Martin Luther King Jr. holiday just happened, and Black History month is days away. Most of all, it fits the internal rhythms of the actors, who have no trouble grasping the easy banter and African dialects of these characters, but also transcend them with a universal sense of drama and international issues of liberty.

Categories: Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Kiss Me Kate In Concert non-review

Cole+Porter+pngAbell_13_0x500

Other than that, how did you like the play?

The unfortunate bit of KissMeKateus Interruptus which occurred when playwright Christopher Durang fell onstage during the encore of “Brush Up Your Shakespeare” in the first of two sold-out performances of Cole Porter’s famous musical at the Yale University Theater on Saturday, Jan. 19, shouldn’t, and ultimately didn’t, overshadow the wonders of this production, which was in some respects a century in the making. (See my previous post for details of Durang’s fall.)

This was a “reading,” with minimal rehearsal and lots of built-in looseness (and thus not appropriate for a no-holds-barred critique, which this article assuredly is not), but it felt historic. This was the world premiere of the “critical edition” of the Kiss Me, Kate score, lavishly resurrected through the intrepid scholarship of David Charles Abell, who also served as conductor and music director of this Yale concert. Abell apparently began piecing together the original score when he was asked to conduct Kiss Me, Kate five years ago for the Glimmerglass Opera. That production was the first Broadway musical staged at Glimmerglass, part of a Shakespeare-themed season which also featured operas based on Measure for Measure, Romeo & Juliet and Julius Caesar. The Glimmerglass Kiss Me, Kate was directed by Diane Paulus (who did the Public Theater revival of Hair which went to Broadway and on tour, and now runs the American Repertory Theatre in Cambridge). The New York Times described Abell’s work on that production as “buoyant.”

And so it remained Saturday afternoon—even more buoyant, I’d wager, due to the concert’s decidedly non-operatic and incessantly celebratory nature. I’ve seen many scholarly recreations of celebrated jazz concerts, and plenty of readings of old musicals (classic and otherwise), and this event fell on the high scale of both genres.

It took the form of a live Old Time Radio broadcast, with Foley Artists slamming doors and cracking whips in a corner of the stage, antique-looking microphones for the lead players, and a dress code which suggested the 1940s. This was not an affectation: Abell’s work on the score brought out a jazziness in it which we might expect from Cole Porter (whose songwriting career flourished in the 1920s and ‘30s) but could not be absolutely sure of in a show he wrote in 1948, at a time when he’d been relatively hitless for a few years and was playing with other styles. Abell’s compelling work as restorer and conductor proved how jaunty and frisky this score was meant to be. He gave it a briskness that blew the dust off the sheet music, and underscored that effort by staging the orchestra’s presentation in a big band manner. During “Why Can’t You Behave?,” a quartet of saxophonists stood to deliver the song’s punchiest instrumental moment, followed in like style by three trumpets and a trombone. The whole endeavor was much jazzier than musical theater scores later became. Kiss Me, Kate was a major hit, but not as influential on other composers as it should have been. When done today, its gloriousness roughness is usually smoothed to mainstream pop-standard mediocrity. With a 45-piece orchestra, studded by guitar, mandolin, and all those magnificent horns and saxes, this was a whole fresh hearing of Kiss Me, Kate.

Supposed “recreations” of classic works are often so “respectful” of the score or text that they become stiff and boring. (I’m talking to you, Wynton Marsalis.) This one was hopping, which is the most respectful posture of all concerning a Cole Porter piece. Even the ballads soared at a speed not often associated with such songs.

As for the cast chosen to put these songs across, and recite the edgy Sam & Bella Spewack dialogue in between, that was another major victory of this production. The performers were all drawn from the ranks of Yale, primarily Yale College and the Yale School of Drama. That’s a vast pool of talent, and the producers did not play it safe. The two male leads—Ethan Freeman as Fred Graham (Petruchio in the Taming of the Shrew play-within-the-play) and Bryce Pinkham as Bill Calhoun/Lucentio—come from sharply different eras and styles. Freeman, who is multi-lingual, has carved out a sterling career doing Broadway or Broadway-style shows (from the Phantom of the Opera to the German smash hit Elisabeth, in major European theaters. He has a rich quasi-operatic voice and enunciates his lines in a matinee-idol theatrical manner, full and rich and dripping with diction. Pinkham, on the other hand, is a more contemporary New York musical theater star, who appeared in Bloody Bloody Andrew Jackson and the musical version of Ghost; when Pinkham was at the Yale School of Drama he starred in a modern rock take on Brecht’s decadent play-with-songs Baal. These disparate characters—both headstrong and dishonest when the situation calls, are vaguely vying for the same woman, Lois Lane. She was feistily played in the concert by Lauren Worsham, whose credits range from operetta and Sondheim to the first national tour of The 25th Annual Putnam County Spelling Bee, and thus could be believably attractive to both men. Sari Gruber portrayed Fred Graham’s former (and future, if the happy ending is to be believed) romantic partner Lilli Vanessi, who literally plays Kate to Graham’s Petruchio in a tour which they “Open in Venice,” as the song goes. Gruber is a trained operatic soprano (and the co-founder of Yale Undergraduate Opera when she was a student); her classic beauty and posture and robust vocals were well matched to Graham’s old-world charms. The Continental verve of Freeman and Gruber was appropriately countered by the sassiness and scrappiness of Pinkham (who announced “dance break!” during an instrumental passage of the self-parodic love song “Bianca,” then glided coolly about the stage) and Worsham (who was ace at coaxing applause from the audience so as to make the encore verses of “Always True to You in My Fashion,” which she was going to perform anyway, seem less inevitable.)

There was technically a fifth member of this love rectangle, a sugar-daddy type named Harrison, played by ubiquitous Connecticut-based actor Bill Kux (a 1983 grad of Yale Drama School). Kux played numerous other supporting roles, as did Asa Somers and narrative presence Geoffrey Owens. These comic-relief guys fell into easy snappy pacing and devil-may-care attitudes. The chorus, made up of current Yale students, brought a youthfulness to the endeavor and were allowed to carry two of the show’s biggest numbers: “Another Openin’, Another Show” and “Too Darn Hot.”

Then there were the two comic gangsters. When high schools do this show,  these roles generally go to the class wise-asses. So it’s perfectly fitting that Gangster #1 (at least at the matinee) was Christopher Durang, who as a playwright has satirized society, highbrow literature, psychoanalysic and the theater itself for 40 years, and Gangster #2 was Robert Lopez, the co-creator of Avenue Q and The Book of Mormon. Durang in particular was an ideal choice, since he was once rumored to be rewriting the book of Kiss Me, Kate for a never-produced ‘90s revival, and openly mocked the musical in his famous one-act The Actor’s Nightmare.

 

I won’t say that these were the greatest pair of gangsters I ever saw in Kiss Me, Kate. Both Durang and Lopez seemed nervous onstage. Both dropped lines, and at one point Durang even dropped his script (finding the right page just in time for his opening line of the next verse, after which he ad-libbed “Whew!”). But they were perfectly cast for this reading. They brought a sense of recklessness and unpredictability and eccentric glee to the show.

 

Which brings me back to the project’s instigator David Charles Abell. He, and the show’s producers, nailed this historically accurate Kiss Me, Kate by keeping it loose, lyrical, jazzy and jovial, letting the scrupulous scholarship and arrangements speak for themselves. There was not a hint of pomposity in the presentation.

Abell’s critical edition of Kiss Me, Kate will soon be published. He has noted that this is only the third time that an American musical theater piece has received this level of scholarly literary treatment which is so common with operas. His desire to raise the standards of artistic scholarship is much appreciated. But more so, in my eyes, is his ability to retain the freshness and zing which Kiss Me, Kate must have had at its 1948 premiere.

It was always true to its darling, in its fashion.

Kiss Me, Kate in concert was the opening volley of a year of events related to the centennial of Cole Porter’s graduation from Yale. Here’s to more Eli revelry and hilarity and balladry in Porter’s name.

Categories: Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Christopher Durang Brushes Up, Falls Down

img376

It was the end of the first encore of “Brush Up Your Shakespeare.” The gangsters started walking offstage, then turned abruptly to return to the microphones for the verses of encore #2.

Christopher Durang, as Gangster #1, did a little jig of step, which got a chuckle from the audience. Then he missed a step, fell onstage, and didn’t get up.

He attempted to right himself, but made a wince of pain. He wisely stayed put. The only thing he said that was audible enough for the audience to hear was “Sorry.”

The show stopped, house lights came up, and these words were actually spoken, in all earnestness:

“Is there a doctor in the house?”

This being an audience of Yalies, half a dozen physicians came forth at once, with others waiting in the wings. The performance was paused for about 20 minutes while police officers and firefighters were called to transport Durang to a hospital.

While they were waiting for help to arrive, a stagehand brought gauze and bandages and Durang’s knee, which didn’t seem to be bleeding, was wrapped.

Durang was rolled into a sheet, hoisted in that sheet, placed on a stretcher, and rolled up the center aisle of the Yale University Theater.

Before he was whisked away, a man in the audience loudly and respectfully intoned “Bravo, Sir!” which led to the longest sustained ovation in an afternoon which had been full of them. Christopher Durang smiled and waved, as if he were a potentate being borne on a palanquin.

The satirical playwright Durang is also an occasional performer (often in his own projects, such as Das Lusitania Songspiel, The Marriage of Bette and Boo, and Christopher Durang & Dawn). This afternoon he was teamed with Robert Lopez, another comic talent known foremost for his writing—Loez is the co-lyricist and co-composer of Avenue Q and The Book of Mormon) as the two gangsters whose big number, “Brush Up Your Shakespeare” is the “11 o’clock number” (i.e. the second-act showstopper) in Kiss Me, Kate, Cole Porter’s immortal musing on Shakespeare’s Taming of the Shrew.

Durang and Lopez were part of an all-star cast delivering a concert rendition of a new “critical edition” of Kiss Me, Kate, lavishly recreated by this performance’s musical director and conductor David Charles Abell (Yale class of 1981) from original manuscripts, orchestrations made for the show in the mid-1940s, and amendments made to orchestra member’s scores during the original Broadway production some 65 years ago. The cast also featured Ethan Freeman as Fred Graham/Petruchio, Sari Gruber as Lilli Vanessi/Kate, Lauren Worsham as Lois/Bianca, Bryce Pinkham as Bill Calhoun/Lucentio, Bill Kux as Harrison Howell and various small roles, Asa Somers as Paul, Johnson Flucker as Gremio, Terrence Chin-Loy as Hortensio, Zina Ellis as Hattie, and Geoffrey Owens as the Stage Manager. Owens, who also read the stage directions for this concert version, ended up playing his role for real when he calmed the audience and made announcements during Durang’s onstage ordeal.

Once Durang had left the building, the performance continued, with just one short scene left to go.

The audience never got to hear the final verses of “Brush Up Your Shakespeare.” Here they are:

If your goil is a Washington Heights dream

Treat the kid to A Midsummer Night’s Dream

If she then wants an all-by-herself night

Let her rest every ‘leventh or Twelfth Night

If because of your heat she gets huffy

Simply play on and Lay on, Macduffy!

Brush up your Shakespeare

And they’ll all kowtow, Forsooth!

And they’ll all kowtow… Thinkst thou?

And they’ll all kowtow—We trou’

And they’ll all kowtow!

Categories: Uncategorized | 6 Comments